ALJ Cheney Issues Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 in Certain Filament Light-Emitting Diodes (337-TA-1220) - Lexology

2021-12-30 09:07:50 By : Ms. peng jin

Review your content's performance and reach.

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

On December 21, 2021, ALJ Clark S. Cheney issued the public version (Part I, Part II, Part III) of his November 19, 2021 final initial determination (“ID”) finding no violation of section 337 in Certain Filament Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same (II) (Inv. No. 337-TA-1220).

By way of background, this investigation is based on an August 31, 2020 complaint by The Regents of the University of California alleging violations of section 337 by Respondents General Electric Company, Consumer Lighting (U.S.) LLC, d/b/a GE Lighting; Savant Systems, Inc. (“Savant”); Home Depot Product Authority, LLC; Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.; The Home Depot, Inc.; Feit Electric Company, Inc.; Satco Products, Inc.; IKEA Supply AG; IKEA U.S. Retail LLC; and IKEA of Sweden AB based on the importation/sale of certain light-emitting diodes and products containing the same that infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,240,529 (“the ’529 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,859,464 (“the ’464 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 10,593,854 (“the ’854 patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 10,658,557 (“the ’557 patent”). The asserted patents generally disclose placing a transparent LED chip on a transparent plate or surface that has been optimized for light extraction. The accused products are light bulbs containing filament LEDs with ceramic submounts, and filament LEDs with flexible (polyamide) surfaces. Savant was terminated from the investigation for good cause on August 27, 2021. An evidentiary hearing was held from August 30 to September 3, 2021.

According to the ID, ALJ Cheney found no violation of section 337 based on the following conclusions of law:

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .

“I enjoy the CLANZ newsstand and find it highly relevant to my job. I definitely have forwarded various articles to my colleagues on occasion where there is a point of general interest, particularly employment or IT law. I really appreciate the service, it's a quick way for me to keep up to date in a way I wouldn't otherwise have time to.”

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research